Hi there.. are you reading my message clearly. I said.. if youtube monetize your videos already... than dont no point allowing rumble to take over. Secondly. rumble claims copy right on my videos and the videos are in my channel. Rumble should play my videos in their youtube channel. I mean, the viewers are within my channel and rumble get paid through my channel. You get what i mean. its all in my channel. So, my advise is.. if youtube paying you than why should i allow rumble take some of my money. m i right. if rumble take my videos and playes in their channel. I agree with you. But rumble doing it in my channel. their taking part of my money. I joined rumble few months ago. First i chose the exclusive lisence.. than after realizing that rumble plays my videos in my channel and taking advantage on my channel. than i change the lisence to exclude youtube. so, from now.. rumble wont claim any copy right in my videos but they plays in rumble platform. my point is.. hope you get my point clear. i m sorry my english is not very high... thanks n bye
Hello TJAlex.
I'm a Rumble creator (uploader) like you are. I don't speak for Rumble, but I've researched this and done the math so I'll tell you what works for most of us. The "Exclusive Management" license option allows Rumble to collect 10% of your earnings through your own channel.
BUT, in exchange, you get promoted on their YouTube channel with almost 900,000 subscribers. You get 90% of that revenue too.
If you can get more earnings on your channel yourself, the math says this is not profitable for you. If you cannot get as many views, then the views on the Rumble Viral YouTube channel will make you more than you lost. I think you would need at least 1M subscribers to get the same number of views. But you're getting 90% from their channel earnings too, so you actually need 81M subscibers to balance the earnings. (You lose 10% of yours but gain 9x as much money from their views if the channel performs equally).
Add in the benefit of promotion on AOL, MSN, Yahoo and other platforms. And the Rumble player.
There's a lot of promotion for such a tinny percentage.
Another thing, Rumble's channel gets almost 1,000 new subscribers per day. I know of only a few big YouTubers who would not benefit from granting full license to Rumble.
Look at your analytics and see what your channel is earning per month. My Rumble channel always makes me 400x the revenue that I was making with YouTube. I believe that if you look at all the factors and do the math, you'll win with Rumble.
Please let me know if you disagree with any of this. I'm open-minded and always looking for somebody to actually demonstrate how they can do better without Rumble. Nobody has ever done it yet.